Only a tiny issue with absolute minimal impact, but thought it may be worth mentioning anyway; I believe the includeDecendents parameter should instead be spelt like: includeDescendents. You can find this on IContentRepository.GetReferencesToContent()
Thanks Dan! I have reported it as a bug.
Descendant vs. descendent http://grammarist.com/usage/descendant-descendent/.
Johan, the bug description says: "The includeDecendents parameter on IContentRepository.GetReferencesToContent() should be spelt includeDescendants." :-)
Well, this appears to have backfired
© Episerver 2017 |
About Episerver World